20 Responses to “Santiago to Tupas: I give you a grade of 3, in UP, that means I pass you but I warn you 2/2 – Santiago Video”

1. mindbender08 says:

   August 3, 2012 at 2:31 pm

   damn, she made her point the exact manner an intellectual person can comprehend. surely, her argument made sense to us all.
   maybe, if there is different group of senators sitting in the office and all of them are intellectual people, surely, there will be a different reason to the result of the impeachment.

   Reply
2. mindbender08 says:

   August 3, 2012 at 2:44 pm

   damn, she made her point the exact manner an intellectual person can comprehend. surely, her argument made sense to us all.
   maybe, if there is different group of senators sitting in the office and all of them are intellectual people, surely, there will be a different reason to the result of the impeachment.

   Reply
3. mindbender08 says:

   August 3, 2012 at 2:56 pm

   damn, she made her point the exact manner an intellectual person can comprehend. surely, her argument made sense to us all.

   Reply
4. 09158667006 says:

   August 3, 2012 at 3:23 pm

   imba!!!

   Reply
5. shaiderspacepolizei says:

   August 3, 2012 at 4:22 pm

   She is ahead of her time that most of the Filipino people cant comprehend… Tandaan nyo Galileo, Einstein, Tesla and other geniuses in the past are being accused na baliw… Now imagine ang naging contribution nila sa mga buhay nyo. She doing the same, she educate us with the law and its flaws that needs to be amended…

   Reply
6. mierlink02 says:

   August 3, 2012 at 4:31 pm

   Bilatra143 bobo ka wala ka kasi alam…

   Reply
7. cerabee22 says:

   August 3, 2012 at 4:53 pm

   TAMA PO…TAMA PO…WE NEED MORE MIRIAM AND ENRILE…AS LONG AS THERE ARE IN THE SENATE PHILIPPINES CAN BE CALLED AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY…MAAYOS SILANG DALAWA..TO BE HONEST MAAYOS PA SA MGA NAGING PRESIDENTE NATIN SIMULA NG MAMATAY SI MAGSAYSAY…

   Reply
8. pnoysuede says:

   August 3, 2012 at 4:58 pm

   si brenda naman may history ng mental instability and that is a fact, may record sa isang psychiatrist yan. si enrile, cayetano siblings, serge osmena, ralph recto, ed angara are lawyers too. clown ba tawag dun? bakit hindi pareho ang desisyon nila dun sa tatlong totoong CLOWNS ng senado?

   Reply
9. wackowako says:

   August 3, 2012 at 5:41 pm

   mdmi kcng clown na judge kya nanalo. hehe

   Reply
10. kumander72 says:

    August 3, 2012 at 6:18 pm

    mas corrupt ang mga pulitiko kaysa kay cj corona.

    Reply
11. Enam Tsal says:

    August 3, 2012 at 6:33 pm

    ratio desidendi ; actual reason for the decision itself. KUMUSTA ANG KONSYENSA MO?

    Reply
12. buymoreleaders says:

    August 3, 2012 at 7:14 pm

    no match! hehe..

    Reply
13. awel2011 says:

    August 3, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    dapat kasi nagreview ka muna tupas.. sayang baba tuloy ng grade mo

    Reply
14. pnoysuede says:

    August 3, 2012 at 8:53 pm

    at bakit ako matatakot sa isang supporter ng isang tiwaling opisyal na hindi marunong mag declare ng tamang yaman? hindi ba totoo na ang sinusuportahan ni brenda ay isang napatunayang sinungaling? hindi ako matatakot sa isang taong katulad ni brenda lalo na kung alam kong suportado ako ng hustisya at mayorya. kayong mga baluktot ang katwiran ang dapat magsama sama sa isang bansa na pinaghaharian ng mga mandarambong sa lipunan.

    Reply
15. pnoysuede says:

    August 3, 2012 at 9:24 pm

    mas tanga kayong dalawa ni brenda dahil napaniwala kayo ng isang tiwaling sinungaling na mahistrado.

    Reply
16. Dropdead0923 says:

    August 3, 2012 at 9:59 pm

    ikaw ang mukang tanga kasi npapaniwala k ng tanga.. XD

    Reply
17. Theodore Marksmen says:

    August 3, 2012 at 10:16 pm

    I hate Legarda. To bits.

    Reply
18. revitupification says:

    August 3, 2012 at 10:41 pm

    Kaya mo bang sabihin kay Brenda mga dakdak mo dito? O baka wala pa man, maihi ka na sa salawal mo makaharap mo lang si Brenda? Bat naman ako maniniwala sa mga taong ang ebidensya hindi authentic at hearsay lang? Sino ngayun ang tanga, mga nakikinig sa argumento ng taong gumagamit ng utak, o mga taong tulad mo naniniwala sa mga taong nagbabaluktot ng katotohanan at nagpapanggap na malinis?

    Reply
19. shirumi says:

    August 3, 2012 at 11:02 pm

    As much as I agree with Sen. Defensor’s arguments, I feel that she has lost track of the real issue. Lack of integrity due to former CJ Corona’s dishonest SALN was the prosecution’s argument for Corona breaching the public trust. Lack of public trust is a ground for impeachment. True, there were steps where the prosecution made a lot of errors, but in the end, Corona himself testified that he did not completely answer his SALN honestly. What more evidence do you need?

    Reply
20. recoy2002 says:

    August 3, 2012 at 11:31 pm

    kaya pala nag guilty nalang c lito lapid kasi di niya na intindihan tong mga to…hehehehe! love meriam…

    Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks